Friday, 4 May 2012

Lecture 9: News Values

So what makes a story a story, and what makes a story news?

There is firstly and obviously, impact. Hearing about severe,world-changing events, such as 9-11 or the death of Michael Jackson, creates a huge impact everywhere.
Secondly, there is identifying with the audience. No-one in Australia cares whether or not Uzbekistan's newest politician will become mayor, so no-one will bother to buy that story. No corporate business cares whether or not Katy Perry and Russell Brand will recover from their shock divorce, just as no teenage girl cares whether the stock interest will rise or fall for Apple.
There is also pragmatics: dealing with ethics, the facticity of information, for everyday, 24/7 news.
Lastly, there is source influence. This was best summed up by Julia Hobsbawm, a public relations executive:


‘Journalism loves to hate PR … whether for spinning, controlling access,
approving copy, or protecting clients at the expense of the truth. Yet
journalism has never needed public relations more, and PR has never
done a better job for the media.’

The lecture noted two main focuses on news values:
If it bleeds, it leads!
And if it's local, it leads!
Definitely true. an example of both was Daniel Morcombe, a sad story that happened to the local population.


When running a newspaper, the Editor's job has to have a defining quality, one which some determine to be the most important: A good sense of news values. News happens everywhere, and journalists frequently have to rely on their instincts in choosing the relevance of a story. If the editor doesn't know what to choose, they might as well be blindfolded. Relevance is extremely important. They must be the funnel that directs the correct news to their newspaper.

But, as we know, some stories are absolutely irrelevant to absolutely anything. Soap opera, movie, or reality TV stars get loads of attention from papers, despite doing nothing at all. The commercialisation of them gets money for the papers, which I find similar to eating sugar: it may taste great the first few times, but it will destroy you from the inside.

Finally, it appears there is large debating over the term of the word newsworthy. What makes a story? What does the audience think is newsworthy today? What will they think is newsworthy tomorrow? The future of journalism depends on those questions.

-Charlie Morris

Thursday, 26 April 2012

Factual Story



Everybody has a phobia. Mine? It was unfortunately placed in the exact right spot that I had to travel.

When I was little, my school co-hosted mini-triathlons for all the primary students. This intensely gruelling, 2km long course was at the hotel I lived in. It consisted of swimming across a lagoon to reach a miniature island, where contestants then rode a bike around the entire island before tagging their friend to run around half of it. Now, while the contest was open for any single person to do, everybody could team up and take it on in groups of 2-3. And every single boy desperately wanted to win that blue ribbon, including me. At one particular triathlon, when I was around 10-11, I was in a group of 2, and was both the swimmer and the runner for our group. There just happened to be one small problem with me and triathlons…
Due to being one of the best swimmers in the grade, every time I worked with any team (we usually signed up as a group of 3 for a greater chance of winning), I was almost always placed in the swimming section. The problem, however, was that despite loving swimming, and despite being desperately eager to win that blue ribbon, I was absolutely, undoubtedly, undeniably terrified of the lagoon I had to swim across. Each year, I almost begged my father to let me swap places with the others, despite both of them usually being useless at swimming. As my dad managed the hotel, regularly checked the safety of it, and almost never found anything wrong with the lagoon, he was indifferent to my pleas. He also didn’t realise several things. Firstly, I had a phobia of being in open water, and I thought the lagoon was extremely dirty from its green/brown colour. Dirty water is extremely hard to see through, and at that age I trusted things that I could see. Murky water only held unknown things that a 10 year olds imagination would warp and twist to become much worse than they could be. Finally, what parents didn’t realise was that when you tell a child something even remotely scary, such as one man getting stung by a stingray, another stung by a stonefish, and two others seeing a barracuda (all in the same lagoon), they tend to remember it for a very long time. Especially after watching Finding Nemo.

So there I was, a few minutes before the race started, even then still trying to change places.  The only reason I was even there was because the only thing I wanted more than staying out of the water was to make my father proud of me, to overcome my fear of open water, and to not disappoint my teammates.
When the whistle blew, I sprinted in and swam as fast as I could, so that I could reach the end and get straight out of that damn water. As I jumped into the murky, dark lagoon, terror instantly seized me. The lagoon was a green/brown colour, with lots of weeds in the bottom. Feeling any of them touch my legs didn’t help, thinking each time it was a certain fish or stingray nibbling my feet. While feeling them made me swim frantically faster, it also reduced my style, in effect slowing me down, which only made me more frantic. Even though several other kids swam beside, behind, and in front of me, I was convinced that something would grab me from the dark depths and pull me under, and I’d be lost among the throng of swimmers until it was too late. Or even worse, the barracuda would appear straight out of the murky water and attack me.  It didn’t matter how unlikely any of these events were, I believed that if it was possible, it was going to happen. While I swam, one piece of weed actually managed to latch onto me. Even though it was flimsy and I broke through it in a second, it terrified me enough to actually freeze in the middle of the lagoon for a second. Luckily, my dad and I had managed to plan this out, although not without my reluctance. Dad was waiting at the end of the swim for me, to yell support when I felt too scared. When he saw me stop swimming halfway through, he started encouraging me from the finish line to keep going. While it was embarrassing, it worked, and I started swimming again. I forced myself to accept that while what could happen was possible, it was extremely unlikely. Closing my eyes also helped.
Finally, exhausted, I landed on the sand at the other side of the lagoon. I almost leaped out of the water when I realised I was at the end.

After the swim, I was only too glad to run. We won the triathlon thanks to our work, and it never felt better to receive that blue ribbon. However, despite competing in and winning many triathlons, many years after the event, I never overcame my fear of that lagoon. While I loved every part of Vanuatu, and the hotel in it, that lagoon always felt wrong. No matter how many times I jumped in, or how many times I swam in it, I never enjoyed it and never tolerated it. Every time, at every event, I would just jump in, swim as fast as I possibly could (definitely not out of training), and finish. I’ve overcome much in my life, but the lagoon still stands out as what I feared most back then. But I would like to return to Vanuatu so I can see if I can finally beat it, as I don't have a fear of open water anymore.

Wednesday, 25 April 2012

A thank you to Bill Watterson.


For those of you who don't know.
Bill Watterson was the creator and and artist of the immensely popular Calvin and Hobbes comic strip, that ran from 1985 to December 31st, 1995. When I was young-didn't think I'd say that for a while- okay, 'younger', I was obsessed with Calvin's antics and vivid imagination. Seeing hundreds of artists miserably fail at capturing a kids perspective of the universe was pretty depressing. I desperately wanted something that was funny, and actually possible to relate to. Garfield, Hagar the Horrible, I devoured these comics and more, but they never gave me the satisfaction of both good comedy and the relatability of thinking: that's exactly what I'd do!
Enter Calvin and Hobbes.
Seeing an almost insanely creative and explosively active kid with a tiger as his best friend was pretty much a dream come true. Watching him do everything we kids ever wanted to do was refreshing...















and, for Gods sake: he had a tiger as his best friend. What beats that?
The main part I admired about Calvin, though, is that Bill captured his antics perfectly. Simple and innocent enough theories for a child to believe, smart enough for them to act on, and yet so creative and vivid only a kid could dream it up. One of the best examples I found was the Transmogrifier, a personal favourite strip section that Calvin created.











Another favourite strip was his boyish instincts that allowed him to grab some of the (to the average boy/teen) most awesome things together and combine them, such as these:

























Again, a perfect perspective. Every boy always starts their dream scenarios: It either starts with a calm, unsuspecting populace right before they're plunged into roaring danger!... or even better, it starts off with extreme danger and tries to add as much excitement as possible in the short time span allowed.
The last part of Bill I loved him for is Calvin's philosophy. His outlook on life was almost identical to my own at the time, and in the moments when I felt alone, seeing that someone else was there that thought the way I do, regardless of how real they were, was comforting.
This is what I love Bill Watterson for. He seemingly effortlessly captures the life of a six year old's perspective on life and channels it straight into comedy. So thank you Bill, for your creativity. Thank you for your enthusiasm. And finally, thank you for not doing what so many have done before: squeezing the potential for a project so much that what's left isn't even recognisable by the end.

Recently, I found out that I wasn't the only one grateful to Bill. Some fans decided to make a short film, saying that they missed his work. The link is below, and it's good: do any of you remember Calvin's snowmen?


Thanks for reading. And again, thanks to Bill for the boost.






Thursday, 19 April 2012

The Public Media

-No commercials. No mercy!
Anchorman

Public Media:
'Media whose mission is to serve or engage a public.'
Public media is a boon. The ABC and SBS are both brilliant networks, that show and create inventive and, thank you God, ORIGINAL shows. The Chasers, Wilfred, The Gruen Transfer, Angry Boys: all these shows are/were creative shows that had a great following.
I noticed that unlike Seven, Nine and Ten, the public media networks showed great tenacity by sticking with the 'simple, not stupid' method. Their shows were easy to follow, yet clever, and also funny, but didn't have to shove the punchline in your face (I'm looking at you, Channel Seven), as well as finally not referring to the most pathetic methods: Preying on the weakest of human needs. The Biggest Loser and Neighbours, stand proud.
Moving on before I start insanely rambling about television programs,
Public media faces challenges: To be independent.
This can be problematic: being held in common by the people is in my belief risky, as no matter how intelligent any individual is, society as a whole is an idiot. Having to be held in legislation by the government is also risky. The Chaser's are proof of that. And the most annoyingly (and important) one: Bias/Agenda.

Regarding the future of public media, there has been discussion for a 'public media 2.0'. I disagree with aspects of this, as I am currently completely satisfied with our current programs (give or take a few Jonathan Holmes. Actually, just take). That would take time and words though, far too many for this post. So,
Good night and enjoy some music (courtesy of a previous blog post by Faye Rentoule)
Thank you,
Charlie Morris.